A Primer on Hell or High Water Clauses in Aviation Leases
"Hell or high water clauses" are a standard fixture of aviation leases, and it appears that courts will generally enforce "hell or high water clauses" in aviation leases, in the absence of extenuating factors. This legal update provides a primer on hell or high water clauses as relates to aviation leases under English Law.
Hell or High Water Clauses
A "hell or high water clause" is a contractual provision in an aviation lease that requires the lessee (the "Airline or Operator") to continue making lease payments under all circumstances, regardless of any issues or disruptions that may arise. These disruptions could include mechanical problems with the aircraft, regulatory changes, economic difficulties, or even external events like war or political unrest. In essence, the lessee must pay the agreed-upon rent “come hell or high water,” without attempting to delay or renegotiate payment terms.
Key Features of Hell or High Water Clauses
Absolute Payment Obligation: The lessee is obligated to make payments without any right to withhold, delay, or reduce payments, regardless of the aircraft’s condition, operability, or external circumstances.
Risk Allocation: These clauses shift most of the financial risk to the lessee, ensuring that the lessor (the aircraft owner) has secure and predictable revenue streams, even if the lessee faces difficulties.
Enforcement in Aviation: Hell or high water clauses are critical in aviation finance because aircraft leasing is often a long-term commitment, and the lessor wants protection against any potential disruptions that could affect the lessee’s financial health or ability to make payments.
Why "Hell or High Water Clauses" Matter in Aviation Leases
There are a number of reasons why hell or high water clauses remain a fixture in aviation leases. These include:
(1) Financing Stability: Lessors often rely on such clauses to secure financing for aircraft. Investors and lenders feel more confident in financing leased aircraft if lease payments are guaranteed under all circumstances.
(2) Repossession: In case of default, the lessor can repossess the aircraft and enforce outstanding payments based on the lease terms, which the hell or high water clause protects.
(3) The Need to Mitigate Lessee Risk: The lessee assumes most of the operational and external risks, including maintenance, operational downtime, or regulatory changes that could affect their ability to use the aircraft.
Relevant Case Law: Wilmington Trust SP Services (Dublin) Ltd v SpiceJet Ltd [2021] EWHC 1117 (Comm)
In the case of Wilmington Trust SP Services (Dublin) Ltd v SpiceJet Ltd [2021] EWHC 1117 (Comm), the claimants sought summary judgment for unpaid rent and other sums owed under dry lease agreements in which the defendant, SpiceJet, had assumed responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the aircraft over a 10-year term.
The English Court upheld the “hell or high water” clause, despite SpiceJet’s defense that it was entitled to withhold payments due to two key reasons: (a) it had become illegal to operate the aircraft due to COVID-19-related travel restrictions imposed by the Indian government, and (b) the leases’ commercial purpose—providing aircraft for commercial use—had been frustrated by these regulatory bans.
The court rejected these arguments, affirming that the hell or high water clause required SpiceJet to continue making payments regardless of the circumstances, underscoring the strength of such clauses in aircraft leasing contracts even amid unforeseen events like the pandemic.

Olu A.
LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), LL.M. (Reading, U.K.)
Olu is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.
olu@balogunharold.com
Kunle A.
LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), Barrister & Solicitor (Manitoba)
Kunle is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.
k.adewale@balogunharold.comRelated Articles
Sovereign Liability Exposure under Nigeria’s Space Economy Regulations - Key Considerations
The decision to cap an operator’s insurance and indemnity obligations at USD 15 million under sections 39 and 40 of the Regulation on Licensing and Supervision of Space Activities, 2015, raises questions as to the extent of residual exposure borne by the Federal Government of Nigeria under international space law.
Certificate of Capital Importation for Capital Goods and Equipment Imports into Nigeria: Key Considerations for Foreign Investors
Foreign investors entering the Nigerian market are often focused on company registration, tax compliance, and import approvals. However, one critical aspect that is frequently overlooked is the requirement to obtain a Certificate of Capital Importation (CCI) for the importation of capital equipment.
The FIRS-DGFIP Memorandum of Understanding: Key Legal Considerations for NRS
The NRS is subject to strict confidentiality and secrecy obligations under Sections 142 and 143 of the Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA), 2025. The general rule mandates the confidentiality and secrecy of all taxpayer information. Under Section 143, taxpayer information may only be shared in the following limited circumstances
Dangote Refinery and the Legal Test for Predatory Pricing: Key Considerations
In the realm of competition law, predatory pricing is an illegal business strategy whereby a dominant operator intentionally reduces prices, often below the cost of production, with the goal of eliminating competitors from the market or preventing the expansion of competitors or entry of new competitors. While low prices are generally celebrated as pro-consumer, competition law draws a careful distinction between aggressive competition on the merits and exclusionary pricing by a dominant firm.