Bank Corporate Client Acquisitions: Employment Law Considerations
In a recent interview, billionaire Femi Otedola allegedly revealed that multiple banks sent “pretty ladies” to woo him for deposits. While this comment drew amusement in some quarters, it raises serious legal and ethical questions under Nigerian labour law and international workplace standards. In this legal update, we outline some key employment law consideration for banks and financial institutions engaged in client acquisition and corporate business development.
Sexual Objectification as a Workplace Practice
Assigning job descriptions and employees, primarily on the basis of physical appearance, rather than competence or merit, may amount to a form of gender-based sexual objectification and may be held to be a violation of Section 42 of the 1999 Constitution (freedom from discrimination) and ILO Convention No. 111.
In our view, if this practice was indeed institutional and not isolated, bank employees involved may have grounds to challenge their employers on several fronts and the practice need not be written or documented for it to be actionable. For instance, if women were selected, incentivized, or subtly pressured to use charm or appearance to attract business, this may constitute constructive dismissal, if such women feel compelled to resign.
Employees may also be able to claim monetary damages for the emotional and psychological distress arising from unwanted attention, ridicule, or even reputational harm. There is also the risk of breaking data protection laws, if employees were ranked or profiled based on physical traits, especially where such profiling is automated.
Key Takeaways
1. Especially with the “international best practices” jurisprudence emanating from the National Industrial Court, financial institutions and other businesses are now even more exposed to risk of legal action and monetary fines, on account of such practices if not reviewed for employment law compliance.
2. Banks need to give greater consideration to employment law issues arising from corporate client acquisition strategies.
How We Can Help
Balogun Harold advises financial institutions and employers on workplace ethics, labour law compliance, risk management and dispute resolution.
Olu A.
LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), LL.M. (Reading, U.K.)
Olu is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.
olu@balogunharold.com
Kunle A.
LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), Barrister & Solicitor (Manitoba)
Kunle is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.
k.adewale@balogunharold.comRelated Articles
Sovereign Liability Exposure under Nigeria’s Space Economy Regulations - Key Considerations
The decision to cap an operator’s insurance and indemnity obligations at USD 15 million under sections 39 and 40 of the Regulation on Licensing and Supervision of Space Activities, 2015, raises questions as to the extent of residual exposure borne by the Federal Government of Nigeria under international space law.
Certificate of Capital Importation for Capital Goods and Equipment Imports into Nigeria: Key Considerations for Foreign Investors
Foreign investors entering the Nigerian market are often focused on company registration, tax compliance, and import approvals. However, one critical aspect that is frequently overlooked is the requirement to obtain a Certificate of Capital Importation (CCI) for the importation of capital equipment.
The FIRS-DGFIP Memorandum of Understanding: Key Legal Considerations for NRS
The NRS is subject to strict confidentiality and secrecy obligations under Sections 142 and 143 of the Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA), 2025. The general rule mandates the confidentiality and secrecy of all taxpayer information. Under Section 143, taxpayer information may only be shared in the following limited circumstances
Dangote Refinery and the Legal Test for Predatory Pricing: Key Considerations
In the realm of competition law, predatory pricing is an illegal business strategy whereby a dominant operator intentionally reduces prices, often below the cost of production, with the goal of eliminating competitors from the market or preventing the expansion of competitors or entry of new competitors. While low prices are generally celebrated as pro-consumer, competition law draws a careful distinction between aggressive competition on the merits and exclusionary pricing by a dominant firm.