NERC Shifts Nigerian Electricity Market to Bilateral Trading
The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has directed the Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading Company (NBET) to stop entering into new contracts for purchasing and reselling electricity or ancillary services. This directive, outlined in the Order on the Transition to Bilateral Trading in the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (the “Order”), ends NBET’s role as the intermediary between Generation Companies (GenCos) and Distribution Companies (DisCos), effective July 25, 2024. Moving forward, GenCos and DisCos are now expected to negotiate and establish bilateral contracts directly for the sale and purchase of electricity.
The Order comes against the backdrop of persistent issues in the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry, such as poor revenue collection practices by DisCos, further exacerbating financial gaps, non-cost reflective tariffs, which have led to significant revenue shortfalls and delayed subsidies from the Federal Government, creating cash flow challenges.
Within this context, the Order aims to reduce the Federal Government’s financial liabilities and to drive greater efficiency within the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry. Specifically, the Order directs GenCos with existing “take-and-pay” agreements to negotiate bilateral contracts with DisCos within 60 days, thereby allowing GenCos to secure more predictable revenues through direct agreements and, by the same token, enabling DisCos to optimise their energy procurement strategies, aligning with consumer demand.
Also, under the new framework created under the Order, the waterfall for the distribution of revenue collected by DisCos is prioritised as follows:
1. Payments for bilaterally traded energy.
2. NBET’s firm contracts with five designated GenCos.
3. Energy under NBET’s interim “take-and-pay” agreements.
Amongst others, this payment hierarchy ensures that bilateral contracts receive top priority, incentivising participants to adopt the new framework.
Lastly, GenCos are required to secure firm GSAs to support their contracted capacity within three months of executing bilateral agreements. These agreements must include “take-or-pay” provisions with penalties for supplier defaults, ensuring stability in fuel supply and enhancing the reliability of electricity generation.
Conclusion
The introduction of bilateral trading marks a pivotal shift in Nigeria’s electricity market, transitioning from a centralised framework to a more competitive, market-driven system. By empowering GenCos and DisCos to trade directly, the new framework promises to address inefficiencies, improve payment certainty, and enhance energy supply quality.

Olu A.
LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), LL.M. (Reading, U.K.)
Olu is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.
olu@balogunharold.com
Kunle A.
LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), Barrister & Solicitor (Manitoba)
Kunle is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.
k.adewale@balogunharold.comRelated Articles
NUPRC Model Concession Agreement (2025 Licensing Round): Back-In Rights, Cost Recovery and Key Negotiation Risks for Licensees
For consortiums, independents, and international oil companies participating in the 2025 Oil Licensing Round, a comprehensive review of the legal and economic architecture of the NUPRC Model Concession Agreement (2025), issued pursuant to Section 85 of the Petroleum Industry Act 2021, is critical.
Allocating Decommissioning Liability in Nigeria Mergers and Acquisitions Transactions: Key Considerations
Despite the apparent tension between these provisions, the more persuasive interpretation is that the regulatory intent is to impose a regime of strict liability on an assignee.
Firing Up the Regulatory Intention Behind Section 317(8) & (9) of the Petroleum Industry Act
Viewed from this perspective, Section 317(8) and (9) is not intended to be a shield for refiners or a legal basis for prohibiting the issuance of additional import licenses. Rather, it is a tool for protecting the local refining industry when an active product shortfall occurs, not during a product surplus.
Nigeria’s Upstream Decommissioning & Abandonment Regulations 2026: Quick-Reference Compliance Guide
The Upstream Decommissioning & Abandonment Regulations 2026 explicitly details end-of-life responsibilities for all asset operators in Nigeria’s upstream patch. To streamline proactive governance and eliminate operational risks, we have provided below an easy-to-follow critical roadmap for Petroleum Prospecting Licence (PPL) and Petroleum Mining Lease (PML) holders in Nigeria