New Minimum Share Capital Requirements for Nigerian Banks
As part of a new Banking Sector Recapitalization Program, Nigeria’s Central Bank has just announced an increase in the minimum share capital requirement of Nigerian banks. This policy update highlights the key elements of the new policy
Policy Objectives of the New Minimum Share Capital Requirements
The objective of the new minimum share capital requirement policy is to:
Strengthen Nigerian banks against external shocks and domestic shocks, as well as enhance the stability of the financial system
Support the achievement of a $1 trillion economy by the year 2030
Key Elements of the Minimum Share Capital Requirement Policy
Nigerian banks must comply with the new minimum capital requirements within a 24-month period, beginning from April 1, 2024.
For existing banks, the new minimum share capital requirement includes paid-up capital and share premium only. Bonus issues, shareholders’ funds, and other reserves and AT1 Capital shall not be recognized for the purpose of meeting the new minimum capital requirements
Banks are required to submit an implementation plan for the minimum share capital requirement, not later than April 30, 2024, indicating the proposed option and timelines for meeting the new capital requirement.
S/N | Bank Categorization | Minimum Share Capital ( | Cut off Date |
1 | International Commercial Banks: | 500,000,000,000 | March 31, 2026 |
2 | National Commercial Banks | 200,000,000,000 | March 31, 2026 |
3 | Regional Commercial Banks | 50,000,000,000 | March 31, 2026 |
4 | National Merchant Banks: | 50,000,000,000 | March 31, 2026 |
5 | National Non-Interest Banks | 20,000,000,000 | March 31, 2026 |
6 | Regional Non-Interest Banks | 10,000,000,000 | March 31, 2026 |
Olu A.
LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), LL.M. (Reading, U.K.)
Olu is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.
olu@balogunharold.com
Kunle A.
LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), Barrister & Solicitor (Manitoba)
Kunle is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.
k.adewale@balogunharold.comRelated Articles
Certificate of Capital Importation for Capital Goods and Equipment Imports into Nigeria: Key Considerations for Foreign Investors
Foreign investors entering the Nigerian market are often focused on company registration, tax compliance, and import approvals. However, one critical aspect that is frequently overlooked is the requirement to obtain a Certificate of Capital Importation (CCI) for the importation of capital equipment.
The FIRS-DGFIP Memorandum of Understanding: Key Legal Considerations for NRS
The NRS is subject to strict confidentiality and secrecy obligations under Sections 142 and 143 of the Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA), 2025. The general rule mandates the confidentiality and secrecy of all taxpayer information. Under Section 143, taxpayer information may only be shared in the following limited circumstances
Doing Business in Lagos, Nigeria: A Strategic Legal Guide for Investors Entering Africa’s Fastest-Growing Market
With a population exceeding 18 million people, Lagos is a megacity that generates roughly 20% of Nigeria’s GDP, making it one of the most important sub-national economies on the continent. In November 2025, the Lagos State Government announced a proposed budget of ₦4.237 trillion, the largest by any sub-national government in Nigeria, signalling a bold, infrastructure-led development agenda
Social Media Platforms in Nigeria - Navigating Competition Enforcement Risk
Without clear guidance on digital markets from the FCCPC, digital markets are at risk of being mischaracterized by regulators. For example, a platform’s decision not to roll out a service in a particular region driven by strategic, technical, or economic considerations could be misconstrued as anti-competitive exclusion.