Insights

Pre-Series Financing: Key Insights for Founders

November 23, 2024
3 min read

Startups often find themselves navigating the complex world of fundraising, and one term that’s becoming increasingly common is the “Pre-Series.” But what does it really mean, and when should you use it?

We find that some startups attach the “Pre-” label to a funding round because they didn’t secure the full target amount or feel the amount raised doesn’t align with what’s typically associated with that stage. But there’s more to it than just numbers. In this update, we break down the concept of a Pre-Series and explore the strategic reasons why startups might deliberately structure or label in this way. Whether you’re a founder planning your next raise or simply looking to understand venture capital dynamics better, this is for you. 

What is a “Pre-Series” Financing? 

A Pre-Series financing is essentially an intermediary funding round that bridges the gap between traditional stages of investment, such as between Seed and Series A, Series A and Series B, or Series B and Series C. A Pre-Series financing is typically named according to its position in the funding sequence, such as “Pre-Series A” or “Pre-Series B. While a Pre-Series round closely resembles a traditional funding round with venture capitalists conducting due diligence, evaluating the start-up’s prospects, negotiating term sheets, and finalising agreements, a Pre-Series round is typically utilised to meet specific objectives before progressing to the next major round.

When Should You Raise a Pre-Series? 

If we assume a start-up that has raised a Series B, a Pre-Series C can make sense where the start-up has shown growth but needs to prove additional metrics (e.g., scaling a new revenue stream or entering a new market) or where the startup is preparing for an IPO or acquisition but needs more traction to boost valuation. There can be a number of other drivers as per as follows:

1. Scaling Operations or Bridging Gaps

A startup may need additional capital to scale operations, expand into new markets, or hire key talent, but its metrics (e.g., revenue, growth rate) may not yet meet the high thresholds expected for a traditional Series C.

2. Preparation for a Full Series C

A start-up may need funds to achieve key milestones or refine its business model to make itself more attractive to Series C investors. Metrics like annual recurring revenue (ARR), user acquisition, or profitability might need bolstering to justify the valuation expected in a Series C round.

3. Market Conditions

Unfavorable market conditions (e.g., economic downturns or tighter venture capital availability) may delay a Series C, forcing the startup to raise an intermediate round to maintain momentum.

4. Investor Alignment

Pre-Series C rounds can serve to bring in strategic investors who can offer more than capital, such as expertise, market access, or partnerships that prepare the company for a more robust Series C round.

5. Burn Rate and Runway Extension

If the startup is running low on funds but still needs time to hit the metrics required for Series C, a Pre-Series C round provides a financial cushion. This avoids the risk of raising a Series C at a lower valuation, which could dilute existing investors more significantly.

6. Valuation Increase

A Pre-Series C financing round can allow a startup to increase its valuation incrementally without the pressure of a full Series C. This positions the start-up to be able to potentially negotiate a higher valuation when it is ready for the larger round.  

This publication is not intended to provide legal advice and is not prepared with a specific client in mind. Kindly seek professional advice specific to your situation. You may also reach out to your usual Balogun Harold contact or contact us via support@balogunharold.com for support.

Olu A.

Olu A.

LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), LL.M. (Reading, U.K.)

Olu is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.

olu@balogunharold.com
Kunle A.

Kunle A.

LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), Barrister & Solicitor (Manitoba)

Kunle is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.

k.adewale@balogunharold.com

Related Articles

Infrastructure, Power & Energy

Sovereign Liability Exposure under Nigeria’s Space Economy Regulations - Key Considerations

The decision to cap an operator’s insurance and indemnity obligations at USD 15 million under sections 39 and 40 of the Regulation on Licensing and Supervision of Space Activities, 2015, raises questions as to the extent of residual exposure borne by the Federal Government of Nigeria under international space law.

Financial Intermediation

Certificate of Capital Importation for Capital Goods and Equipment Imports into Nigeria: Key Considerations for Foreign Investors

Foreign investors entering the Nigerian market are often focused on company registration, tax compliance, and import approvals. However, one critical aspect that is frequently overlooked is the requirement to obtain a Certificate of Capital Importation (CCI) for the importation of capital equipment.

Financial Intermediation

The FIRS-DGFIP Memorandum of Understanding: Key Legal Considerations for NRS

The NRS is subject to strict confidentiality and secrecy obligations under Sections 142 and 143 of the Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA), 2025. The general rule mandates the confidentiality and secrecy of all taxpayer information. Under Section 143, taxpayer information may only be shared in the following limited circumstances

Infrastructure, Power & Energy

Dangote Refinery and the Legal Test for Predatory Pricing: Key Considerations

In the realm of competition law, predatory pricing is an illegal business strategy whereby a dominant operator intentionally reduces prices, often below the cost of production, with the goal of eliminating competitors from the market or preventing the expansion of competitors or entry of new competitors. While low prices are generally celebrated as pro-consumer, competition law draws a careful distinction between aggressive competition on the merits and exclusionary pricing by a dominant firm.