Infrastructure, Power & Energy

Roads & Highways Financing in Nigeria - Key Legal Considerations

June 12, 2025
3 min read

According to the World Bank, up to 80% of Nigerian roads are in poor condition, and only about 30% are paved. According to the National Integrated Infrastructure Master Plan (NIIMP) and the African Development Bank, Nigeria has an infrastructure financing gap of over $3 trillion, and it needs to spend at least $100 billion annually for the next 30 years to close this gap. Given ongoing budget constraints, the Nigerian government is now actively courting private capital as a strategy for roads and highways financing in Nigeria.

This legal update focuses on some of the more commonly utilized roads and highway financing structures in Nigeria, excluding multilateral financing sources such as those provided by the World Bank, African Development Bank (AfDB), and China EXIM Bank, which, though significant, are not the focus of this review.

1. EPC+F

Increasingly, the Nigerian government seeks partners who bring not just technical know-how, but also financing capacity. Under EPC+F (Engineering, Procurement, Construction + Financing) models, contractors design and build road infrastructure and also arrange the upfront financing, which the government repays over time. Typically, the construction company would only be expected to finance a percentage of the costs. The EPC + F model is particularly attractive to the Nigerian Government because of the benefit of off-balance sheet financing. The EPC+F reduces reliance on public borrowing and, therefore, presents an opportunity for foreign construction firms with access to credit markets.

2. Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs)

PPPs have become a cornerstone of roads and highways financing in Nigeria since the early 2000s. The most common PPP structure for roads and highways financing in Nigeria is the Design-Build-Finance-Operate (DBFO) model. A notable example is the Lekki-Epe Expressway, Lagos, Nigeria’s first toll road PPP. While controversial, the PPP model used for the Lekki Expressway proved that user-pay models are a viable way to finance roads and highways in Nigeria. Leveraging past successes, Nigeria’s Government has rolled out and awarded a number of toll-based concession models to improve maintenance, revenue recovery, and private operator viability through the Highway Development and Management Initiative (HDMI).

3. Sukuk Bonds: Project-Tied Islamic Finance

Since 2017, Nigeria has issued Sukuk bonds. These are sharia-compliant instruments that fund specific road projects. These bonds have financed over ₦600 billion in projects, covering more than 70 roads across Nigeria.

4. Infrastructure Tax Credit Scheme 

The Infrastructure Tax Credit Scheme is an innovative roads and highways financing model that allows private firms to finance road projects and recover the cost as a tax credit. The scheme is particularly attractive for large corporates with significant tax exposure.

How We Can Help

Our infrastructure and construction practice supports EPC contractors, PPP developers, toll operators, and infrastructure funds entering or expanding in Nigeria. We offer full legal advisory on project finance, PPPs, and tax credit structures, including contract drafting, due diligence, compliance reviews, bid support, regulatory clearance, and dispute resolution.  

Balogun Harold's insights are shared for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. For tailored guidance, please contact our Construction & Infrastructure Lawyers at bhlegalsupport@balogunharold.com.

Olu A.

Olu A.

LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), LL.M. (Reading, U.K.)

Olu is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.

olu@balogunharold.com
Kunle A.

Kunle A.

LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), Barrister & Solicitor (Manitoba)

Kunle is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.

k.adewale@balogunharold.com

Related Articles

Infrastructure, Power & Energy

Sovereign Liability Exposure under Nigeria’s Space Economy Regulations - Key Considerations

The decision to cap an operator’s insurance and indemnity obligations at USD 15 million under sections 39 and 40 of the Regulation on Licensing and Supervision of Space Activities, 2015, raises questions as to the extent of residual exposure borne by the Federal Government of Nigeria under international space law.

Financial Intermediation

Certificate of Capital Importation for Capital Goods and Equipment Imports into Nigeria: Key Considerations for Foreign Investors

Foreign investors entering the Nigerian market are often focused on company registration, tax compliance, and import approvals. However, one critical aspect that is frequently overlooked is the requirement to obtain a Certificate of Capital Importation (CCI) for the importation of capital equipment.

Financial Intermediation

The FIRS-DGFIP Memorandum of Understanding: Key Legal Considerations for NRS

The NRS is subject to strict confidentiality and secrecy obligations under Sections 142 and 143 of the Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA), 2025. The general rule mandates the confidentiality and secrecy of all taxpayer information. Under Section 143, taxpayer information may only be shared in the following limited circumstances

Infrastructure, Power & Energy

Dangote Refinery and the Legal Test for Predatory Pricing: Key Considerations

In the realm of competition law, predatory pricing is an illegal business strategy whereby a dominant operator intentionally reduces prices, often below the cost of production, with the goal of eliminating competitors from the market or preventing the expansion of competitors or entry of new competitors. While low prices are generally celebrated as pro-consumer, competition law draws a careful distinction between aggressive competition on the merits and exclusionary pricing by a dominant firm.